Teaching During the COVID-19 Pandemic

When a bomb goes off, many of the people in the immediate vicinity of the explosion often get killed instantly or die from their injuries shortly thereafter. Some people may get hit with shrapnel or falling debris and suffer life-threatening injuries, even if they ultimately survive. Others may suffer minor injuries that are not life-threatening. Still others manage to escape the explosion completely unscathed. Even a lucky few benefit, in a way, from the destructive event. For example, think of the construction firms and the workers they hire to rebuild what the bomb destroyed as just one example of those who find fortune in the aftermath of mayhem. Ultimately, these effects of the explosion are all felt long after the initial blast.

The COVID-19 pandemic has been like a series of bombs detonating all over the world at different times and in different degrees of intensity. Like an explosion, a COVID-19 outbreak kills many people. And just like an explosion may leave many victims with serious long-term injuries, COVID-19 has claimed its share of “long haulers,” or people who still have symptoms months after being ill. The comparison between bombs and the pandemic doesn’t end with how people suffer, though, because just like bombs may directly or indirectly benefit some, COVID-19 has also greatly rewarded businesses and individuals uniquely positioned to take advantage of the situation. It’s a well-known fact that companies like Amazon saw a massive increase in sales as people staying home relied more on the delivery of products, leading Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos to see his already considerable wealth increase by tens of billions of dollars, even while many millions lost their jobs through no fault of their own. And just like how the repercussions of an explosion are felt long after the dust settles and the smoke clears, we will very likely be living with the fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic, both in terms of public health and the economy, for many years to come.

Due to the nature of how the COVID-19 virus spreads, the basic guidelines for preventing infection include wearing masks, social distancing, and frequent handwashing. Although plenty of people taking these precautions have still gotten infected, many of the people consistently adhering to these guidelines have managed to dodge the COVID-19 bullet, including me. Throughout this pandemic, I have avoided crowds as much as possible, worn a mask almost every time I’m out of my apartment, and washed my hands almost to the point of obsession. Of course, these personal safety measures have gone a long way to keep me safe. However, I cannot overlook the fact that a big reason I have managed to steer clear of infection is because of what I do for a living. As a teacher, I am blessed to have a career with a professional organization aggressively advocating on my behalf at the national, state, and local level. Thanks in part to the efforts of the United Teachers of Dade (UTD), our local teachers’ union, schools in my district closed completely in March 2020 and reopened only after the union was able to secure significant safety concessions, including offering parents the option to keep their children at home with online learning and strict masking, sanitization, and social distancing protocols for in-person learning, including broad guidelines for quarantining any students and staff who are exposed to the virus. Together with these important safety measures, we suffered no layoffs or interruption in pay. In fact, amid all the chaos surrounding the pandemic and school closures, UTD negotiated pay raises for members of the bargaining unit.

So, when determining how COVID-19 has impacted my profession, it becomes clear that it’s also important to acknowledge how my profession has impacted COVID-19. Because without our union pushing for school closures and the implementation of strict public health and safety measures upon reopening, it is very possible that the pandemic’s impact would have been far worse than it already is, since the proximity that comes with in-person learning could fuel what would essentially be thousands of daily super-spreader events occurring simultaneously across the school district.

Nevertheless, COVID-19 is having a profound effect on my career as a teacher. We had to rethink and reinvent instructional delivery on the fly when schools closed last year. This school year, we’ve had to navigate the challenges of teaching both in-person and online students while observing COVID-19 protocols at the school site. And as we reach the end of the school year, we begin looking out toward a hopeful but ultimately uncertain future as we anticipate the return to full in-person learning this fall. That is where we’re at right now: still recovering, and in some cases still suffering, from the havoc wrought upon our lives by the pandemic, all while keeping an eye toward a future where things may be a little better in certain instances, a little worse in others, but definitely very different overall.

Probably the area in which the COVID-19 pandemic had its greatest impact on my career is in terms of self-care. Sure, self-care often pertains to out-of-the-worksite activities, such as exercising and getting a good night’s sleep. And there was certainly no shortage of ways in which my increased self-care manifested in areas that had little or nothing to do with work. With many restaurants closed or offering limited service, I naturally gravitated toward cooking healthier food and eating at home rather than ordering delivery. As a result, my cooking skills improved considerably. On top of that, I also started doing things like baking my own bread and starting a small fruit, vegetable, and herb garden in my apartment balcony. Being cooped up all day long cooking and watering my plants, though, was not an option if I was to take self-care seriously. So, I made sure to include lots of bike riding as an opportunity to get much-needed exercise and fresh air.

Perhaps most importantly when it comes to self-care, the COVID-19 pandemic taught me to appreciate every moment, because life is fragile and way too short. This idea stretches beyond my personal life into my approach to teaching and how COVID-19 has impacted my career. Now I find that, while I still have the same high expectations I’ve always had with my students, I also emphasize empathy. This is crucial because, to return to the earlier COVID-19 bomb analogy, we don’t know which of our students or their close family members have been caught at or near the proverbial ground zero. Also, while I learned early on in my teaching career not to take things personally, the COVID-19 pandemic has given that idea a booster shot. These are all parts of a holistic approach to self-care. Because while eating healthy and exercising offer self-care for the body, gratitude, empathy, and grace are self-care for the mind and spirit.

The idea of self-care created a solid foundation over which I could build a whole new approach to teaching. And while we may be looking to a return to normal soon, some of these new teaching practices I’ve adopted during the pandemic are likely to become a permanent part of my teaching repertoire. The first of these is the use of digital resources. I was not a stranger to having students turn in work digitally before the pandemic. I have used tools like Edmodo for years, and my students would see an online quiz from time to time in my class long before COVID-19 was around. But school closures and fully online learning forced us to forego physical resources almost entirely. Gone completely, albeit temporarily, were printed packets and reading passages. However, even as we prepare for full in-person learning next school year, I intend to keep using many of the digital resources I came to rely on during the pandemic. Not only is it easier to compile and analyze student data when they turn in an assignment online, using digital resources also literally saves trees, since we end up using a lot less paper. Assigning things online also facilitates both remediation and enrichment, so I can better help the students who are struggling and more effectively challenge those who are advanced.

One clear way that COVID-19 has impacted my career is by amplifying the limitations that are a natural part of teaching. Dealing with insufficiently motivated students is one of the constants of the teaching profession. Often, these students lack parental support, but realistically it can be a myriad of factors that contribute to a student struggling with school. As teachers, we are always grappling with engaging unmotivated students, challenging advanced students, and helping students who may not necessarily have a motivation problem but could be struggling with any number of issues or situations that require an individualized approach to help them reach their full academic potential. This is all par for the course in the challenges a teacher faces from one school year to the next. But COVID-19 has thrown a veritable monkey wrench into this already challenging aspect of our profession. Because on top of the obstacles we normally face throughout the day-to-day tasks of our job, COVID-19 has forced us to reinvent what we do as we attempt to teach diverse learners via Zoom while they are at home, often with all kinds of distractions and sometimes even unhealthy home environments. Of course, there is also the digital divide that exists in some communities, where the students who often need the most help have unreliable Internet service or devices that don’t work properly, if they have a device at all. There are many students who have simply stopped attending Zoom class sessions altogether.

That doesn’t mean the teaching challenges augmented by the COVID-19 pandemic are limited to online learning. In-person learning has also changed. Because there are many students learning from home, and due to minimum social distance requirements district-wide, classrooms are usually not as full as they were pre-pandemic. And the students who are there are wearing masks while they all sit facing the same direction. Cooperative groups where students can collaborate closely together are not practical for safety reasons during the pandemic. Activities where the students can take turns writing on the whiteboard, while not prohibited outright, are virtually impossible since it’s not safe for students to be sharing materials like whiteboard markers. A vocabulary game I used to do that the students thoroughly enjoyed has been indefinitely suspended due to the pandemic because it required students to take turns at the smartboard and would thereby expose them to touching the same surface.

As if all these challenges weren’t enough, we’ve also had to endure frequent disruptions caused by students, teachers, and staff having to quarantine due to testing positive for the COVID-19 virus or being significantly exposed to someone who is infected. I lost count of the times an administrator got on the PA and called down entire classes worth of students to be sent home. The friendly morning and afternoon greetings or the chats with our colleagues between class periods in the hallway were muted as teachers were also sent home. Some teachers I haven’t seen this school year at all, except on camera in our Zoom faculty or UTD unit meetings, because they received ADA accommodations to teach from home full-time. While I don’t criticize these measures that have been implemented to keep us safe, there is no denying that school morale has been negatively impacted.

Another one of the most direct ways COVID-19 has impacted my career revolves around my daily routine. First and foremost, when I arrive at my worksite, I wear masks. For a while, I was wearing two masks plus a face shield. I’ve stopped wearing the face shield, but I still wear a double mask. Once I get to the classroom, my disinfecting and ventilating ritual begins. With a disinfecting wipe in my hand, I open all the windows. I place a small oscillating fan on the windowsill behind my desk and plug in an air purifier at a nearby outlet. I wipe down the phone, desk, keyboard, mouse, monitor buttons, desk drawer handles, doorknobs, and whiteboard markers. Finally, I walk around the entire class spraying disinfectant. Once I do all of this, I feel safe enough to remove my masks while inside my classroom. I get to enjoy at least a few minutes of unrestricted breathing before putting the masks back on when the students arrive. But it’s not just my interaction with my environment that has been impacted by COVID-19 because my interactions with students and colleagues is also different, as alluded to before. Sometimes I don’t see certain colleagues or students for several days because they are under quarantine. Or I may not see any of them at all, at least not in person, when I’ve been placed under quarantine myself. And when I do see them, of course we’re all wearing masks, and we keep our distance. Any physical greeting at all is usually limited to the now ubiquitous elbow bump. Some of the teachers that I would see only at faculty meetings because they work in a different part of the campus, I have not seen in person at all this school year because our faculty meetings are now on Zoom.

Most of these changes and adjustments have been highly disruptive. But one unexpected development related to the impact of COVID-19 on my career involves my own sense of job security. My first year as a full-time teacher was when the annual contract law went into effect. That made my first few years teaching a harrowing experience full of uncertainty and insecurity. While I have since settled into my current teaching assignment at my present worksite, rapid advances in technology, especially in the educational field, have often made me wonder if it’s only a matter of time before teachers themselves are deemed “obsolete.” However, COVID-19 changed that. If nothing else, this pandemic has made it clear that the teaching profession is not going anywhere, as many families across the country confirmed how important the face-to-face interaction students have with their teachers and peers is for not only the academic progress, but also the healthy social and emotional development of children. The COVID-19 pandemic made many people realize, some for the first time ever incredibly enough, that there is no substitute for in-person learning under the guidance of a highly qualified teacher. So, I now feel much more at ease in my career, not just because I was one of the very blessed and lucky people who was able to retain employment throughout the pandemic, but because I realize I’m not about to lose my job to a computer. If nothing else, with all the people pushing to reopen the economy and get everybody back to work, I realized how important my job is, even if some misguided folks see teachers as not much more than “just a glorified babysitter.”  

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the entire world is severe and ongoing. Millions have died, and many millions more have gotten seriously ill. To bring back the earlier analogy about bombs, the COVID-19 explosions are still happening, even if they are decreasing in frequency and intensity in some parts thanks to aggressive vaccination efforts. With such a pervasively destructive event that has made such a negative impact on so many lives, it can be difficult to even acknowledge that anything positive can come of this. However, very often the best way to move forward is to get through all the hardships and pain that come with the adversity and uncertainty of loss. Only then can we begin to find the glimmer of a better tomorrow sparkling in the distant horizon. That’s how I see the impact COVID-19 has had on me, and especially on my career. I’ve lost family members and endured personal challenges. My job as a teacher has taken on a whole new dimension as we strive to meet the challenge of teaching our students under circumstances that are far from ideal. But through it all, I get to keep the things that have made me a better teacher, and that’s how the adversity of this pandemic can be turned into a victory for the leaders of tomorrow.

Teaching in the Time of Coronavirus and Beyond

The coronavirus pandemic forced everyone to deal with a significant health and safety issue. Schools, as places where diseases can quickly spread, had to close and transition to distance learning online. Beyond the immediate health and safety concern, though, this pandemic also gives us an impromptu dry run of what a fully online education ecosystem would be like.

Distance learning in response to the coronavirus shows us what’s possible for the future of education in a world where we can already get just about everything delivered and streamed right into our homes. Will educators be proactive and embrace this new reality? Can we become beacons of worker unity and solidarity in an increasingly isolated world as we continue to achieve excellent learning outcomes for our students? These are important questions to consider and address in the coming months and years.

To be clear, we would be right to assert that there’s no substitute for in-person learning in a traditional school setting. However, news reports that often depict schools as dens of disease, drugs, violence, and even death, might lead more and more parents to make the trade-off to online education.

In light of this reality, education leaders at the federal, state, and local levels should consider these three basic policy proposals for the future implementation of a fully or partially online education system:

1. Keep teacher:student ratios comparable to current traditional school levels

All teachers are responsible for teaching their students according to each student’s individual needs and learning style. This takes significant time and effort, regardless of whether the teaching is conducted online or in a traditional setting. Therefore, online teachers should have about the same number of students as a traditional classroom teacher.

2. No reduction in teacher compensation

Online teachers are constantly planning lessons, differentiating instruction, and assessing each student's academic progress, just like a traditional classroom teacher. They must also be in continual contact with individual students and their parents for remediation or enrichment. Online teachers are doing the same job as traditional teachers, so they should obviously receive the same pay and benefits.

3. Continue addressing education inequities

A fully or partially online model would amplify some of the inequities that many students already face in a traditional school setting. As always, we must continue advocating for all our students, so they can receive the high quality education they deserve, regardless of their background. One way to do this would be to provide electronic devices, Internet access, and free or reduced meals for students in need who are learning from home.

The trend towards more online teaching and learning will likely continue, even beyond the coronavirus pandemic. As time goes on, parents may become less willing to expose their children to an environment they increasingly identify with bullying, substance abuse, virus outbreaks, and mass shootings. In response, educators should welcome the future and focus on continuing to be the key to student success, whether we practice our profession in person or online.

My Star Wars Superlatives

Right now, in this very galaxy....

The nine episode Star Wars saga is finally over, so this would be a good time for me to compile my list of Star Wars Superlatives. The categories and selections are all completely subjective, and in no particular order of importance. This is just my excuse to go over the entire film series and pick out a way in which each film stands out. So, here they are: My Star Wars Superlatives....

BEST SToRY

Episode IV - A New Hope
The one that started it all, a long time ago (almost 43 years ago as of this writing), gets the nod for Best Story. And why not? When Episode IV - A New Hope, came out, it was just Star Wars. That's it. There were no Episodes. No trilogies, prequels or sequels. Just one movie. And if this had been the only movie of the series ever made, it's easy to see that it doesn't really need anything else to make it a good film that tells a complete story. It has all the elements of the classic hero's journey, and it follows a dramatic arc to a T. It's all there. Every Star Wars after that adds to the mythology, but the first one can stand alone. And that's why, A New Hope wins Best Story.


MoST visually BEAuTiFuL

Episode VIII - The Last Jedi
The Last Jedi has gotten a lot of flack from many Star Wars fans for the way it seems to upend some of the Star Wars lore, as well as present long-established characters in new, unconventional ways: Luke as a grumpy old quitter; Leia as a death-defying Force master (this was a genuine facepalm moment for me when I saw it in the theater, and it still makes me shake my head whenever I see it); the powerful Snoke quickly dispatched by Kylo Ren. Those are just some of the more glaring examples. Other elements are more superficial and seem almost petty on the filmmaker's part, such as when Kylo Ren destroys his helmet. On the other hand, some interesting choices are more fundamental in nature and actually point the Star Wars story in compelling directions, like when the kid at the end uses the Force on the broom, or how Kylo Ren and Rey employ a form of Force telepathy to communicate with each other. However, putting aside all the controversial plot decisions, the way The Last Jedi stands out to me is the way it looks. In a film series loaded with all kinds of stunning visuals, The Last Jedi is a truly impressive spectacle, from Holdo's kamikaze maneuver to the fight scene in Snoke's chamber to the casino on Canto Bight. And all that makes The Last Jedi the Most Visually Beautiful Star Wars film. 

BEST oPENiNG SCENE

Episode III - Revenge of the Sith
Pretty much every Star Wars movie jumps right into the action as soon as the opening crawl fades into the darkness of space. But Revenge of the Sith takes it to a whole new level, as we get thrown right into the middle of a harrowing space battle while Anakin and Obi-Wan attempt a daring rescue. Everything about this opening scene is excellent. From the way it drops you straight into all the chaos, to the accompanying musical score, I still get goosebumps when I watch it. The opening scene in Revenge of the Sith puts you on the edge of your seat right from the start better than all the other Star Wars movies, and that makes it the Best Opening Scene.


DARKEST Movie

Episode IX - The Rise of Skywalker
The last entry in the Star Wars saga is easily the darkest of them all. By "darkest" I'm not referring to the story or anything having to do with the Sith. In fact, this film could have been much darker story-wise if only Chewbacca had actually died and C3PO had stayed with his memory fried. The Star Wars saga is tinged with tragedy throughout, with important and beloved characters dying in almost every movie, so that would not have been out of the ordinary for the series. But the darkness I am referring to is literally an absence of lighting. I went to see this movie in the theater in 3D, and I found it difficult at times to make out the details. I attributed this to the 3D format, or possibly a defect with the theater projector. But it was just as bad when I saw the 2D version at home on Blu-ray. It's just a very shadowy movie. There's no doubt that the scenes on Exegol call for a certain degree of gloom, but filmmakers can convey a dingy atmosphere in a film without actually making it hard to see what the hell is going on. There were news reports of production problems surrounding this film. So, did the filmmaker simply run out of time and cover up a lack of detail with just... a lack of light? Whatever the case may be, The Rise of Skywalker, doing its best John Cena ("You can't see me") impersonation, gets dubbed the Darkest Movie in the series.


BEST ENDiNG

Episode VI - Return of the Jedi (original theatrical release)
I don't know if, by the time Return of the Jedi came out, George Lucas had already envisioned the nine episode arc. Regardless, Return of the Jedi was the last Star Wars movie for many years afterwards. So, that would make having a satisfying ending very important. And the ending was indeed enjoyable. Return of the Jedi was the first Star Wars film I saw in the theater (I was too young when both A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Back came out). The original theatrical release features a fun, festive, lighthearted closing scene that depicts the Rebel heroes on the moon of Endor after defeating the Empire, celebrating with the Ewoks, who were instrumental to their final victory. They all dance and sing together to a happy Ewok party song. When Lucas later released the Special Editions, he completely changed the closing scene to show celebrations all over the galaxy, with a different, less quirky, musical score playing underneath. I get it. It's called Star Wars, not Ewok Wars. But I definitely miss the jovial forest revelry when watching the later versions of this film. And that's why I give the Best Ending award to the original theatrical release of Return of the Jedi.


BEST LiGHTSABER BATTLE

Yoda vs. Count Dooku
Episode II - Attack of the Clones
When Attack of the Clones came out, we had seen four Star Wars movies over the previous 25 years, including a number of great lightsaber battles: Obi-Wan vs. Darth Vader in A New Hope, where Vader kills Obi-Wan; Luke vs. Vader in The Empire Strikes Back, where Vader cuts off Luke's hand and reveals his true identity; Luke vs. Vader II in Return of the Jedi, where Vader turns on the Emperor and saves his son; Qui-Gon Jinn & Obi-Wan vs. Darth Maul, where we see Darth Maul use his imposing double-sided lightsaber. In all that time, we never saw Yoda wield a lightsaber. In fact, we had only seen Yoda as a short, old, frail-looking creature with big eyes and long pointy ears. Sure, he was a Jedi Master and very powerful with the Force. But Yoda seemed feeble, getting around slowly with the aid of a small walking stick. And then came Attack of the Clones, specifically his lightsaber battle against Count Dooku. I still remember the audience reaction in the theater when Yoda sprang up from the ground and became some sort of Force acrobat! While brief, especially compared to the epic, and ultimately far more consequential, confrontation between Anakin and Obi-Wan later in Episode III, the "wow" factor alone of seeing Yoda move like we had never seen him move before makes Yoda vs. Count Dooku in Attack of the Clones the Best Lightsaber Battle.


CooLEST uSE oF THE FoRCE

Kylo Ren stopping the blaster beam in midair
Episode VII - The Force Awakens
By the time the sequel trilogy launched with The Force Awakens, we had witnessed a wide variety of manifestations of the Force: Obi-Wan manipulating weak-minded Stormtroopers ("These aren't the droids you're looking for."); Darth Vader choking an Imperial military officer from a distance ("I find your lack of faith disturbing."); Yoda lifting Luke's X-wing starfighter out of the swamp ("Do. Or do not. There is no try."); even Palpatine shooting lightning from his fingertips ("Unlimited Power!"). But when I saw Kylo Ren stop a blaster beam in midair, I immediately thought that was the Coolest Use of the Force I had ever seen!


MoST AWESoME vEHiCLE

At-At
Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back
You might say that right alongside the stories of battles between good and evil, the Star Wars movies also showcase a wide array of awesome vehicles. Whoever thought that getting around could be so cool in a galaxy far, far away? Right from the opening scene of A New Hope, we see the ominous and overwhelming sight of a huge Star Destroyer chasing after Princess Leia's ship. And any discussion of Star Wars vehicles of course has to include the most famous one of them all, the Millennium Falcon. But nothing is quite as amazing as what we see in the Battle of Hoth in The Empire Strikes Back. What's more astonishing than dinosaurs? And what's cooler than robots? Well... how about giant robot dinosaurs! That's basically the best way to describe the At-At, and that's what makes it the Most Awesome Vehicle in the Star Wars saga!


GoNE Too SooN

(Tie) Qui-Gon Jinn & Darth Maul
Episode I - The Phantom Menace
As the prequel trilogy was released, we obviously knew that the events in those movies take place before the events in the original trilogy. So, any characters we see in the prequel trilogy that also appear in the original trilogy are characters that we know will survive the events of the prequel trilogy. Anakin, Obi-Wan, R2D2, C3PO, Palpatine, Yoda, etc. Those are locks for the entirety of the prequel trilogy. But two of the best characters in the prequel trilogy are killed off in the very first movie. The untimely death of both characters leaves us to wonder just how much better the other two films in the prequel trilogy might have been had they survived. Alas, it was not to be! Of course, I'm talking about Qui-Gon Jinn and Darth Maul, two characters in the Star Wars saga that were most definitely Gone Too Soon.


BEST ovERALL

Episode IV - A New Hope
And so, after evaluating all nine films in the Star Wars saga, I am left with choosing the best overall, and how could I choose any other than the original? Star Wars Episode IV - A New Hope introduces us to an exciting new galaxy of interesting characters that are otherworldly, but at the same time incredibly accessible. The plot takes us through a journey of adventure and self-discovery, heroic sacrifice and personal triumph. The special effects, costumes, and set design create a world that we obviously would want to revisit again and again. From the opening scene, with the Star Destroyer taking over the entire screen, to the introduction of probably the most iconic weapon ever created in all of fiction, and with both reluctant and eager heroes, to those who sacrifice themselves for the greater good, and an all-encompassing energy that can be harnessed by those who wield it for good as well as those who use it for selfish purposes to gain more power, Star Wars Episode IV - A New Hope, the one from which the ever-expanding Star Wars universe began, is the Best Overall.    

Why I'm Leaving Facebook

The title of this blog post can be somewhat misleading. First of all, I'm not necessarily going to abruptly delete my Facebook account. Leaving Facebook might be more of a gradual process over an undefined period of time, like a crab slowly molting its old shell. On the other hand, in some ways I've already left Facebook, even though my account is still active as of this writing. To begin with, some context is necessary, especially since this isn't the first time I've had a problem with Facebook and its privacy policy.  

When Facebook first started taking off, I liked MySpace much better. After all, I could customize my MySpace page while everybody's Facebook page was the same old white and blue. Booooring! So I resisted jumping on the Facebook bandwagon as long as I could. Eventually Facebook grew on me, like a rapidly spreading rash that's highly uncomfortable but gives you a strange satisfaction when you scratch it. I started spending more and more time on it, posting, liking and commenting on others' posts, and keeping in touch with old (and new) friends. I even attended a high school reunion BBQ organized almost exclusively through Facebook. Good times! Unfortunately, it didn't stay that way.

Fast forward to the 2016 presidential election and the subsequent Trump presidency. During this time, I "lost" a number of Facebook friends over the tribalism and division that emerged in this political environment including, ironically enough, the friend who had hosted the high school reunion BBQ a few years earlier. I attempted to counteract the toxic politics by creating a private Facebook group called Meet at the Center, where members with different political views could debate the issues respectfully. The group soon sputtered though, as I noticed that most of the members preferred to continue posting on their own pages rather than on the group page. I realized that they probably preferred to bask in the warmth of their own respective echo chambers rather than submit their views to scrutiny and challenges.

And so it's come to this. I'm taking some of the more recent not-so-surprising news about Facebook mishandling users' data as my cue. It's not the first time, or even the second or third time, so we're way beyond the question of who the shame belongs to. My privacy is my responsibility, and allowing Facebook to violate it continuously is totally on me.

I've already scaled back my Facebook use to almost nothing for weeks now. That makes any official decision to leave Facebook more of a formality than anything else. My biggest concern through all this is the reason I joined Facebook in the first place: keeping in touch with people I care about. To that end, I'll keep my Messenger account active for the time being so that my Facebook friends who wish to stay in contact can message me and get my phone number if they don't already have it. That way, we can have a real friendship outside of Facebook and maybe even meet up face to face every once in a while, which is always nice.

Getting Our Fiscal House in Order Part 2: The Republican Tax Plan

Nearly five years ago, I wrote about the need for us to get our fiscal house in order. This was in the midst of calls by then-President Obama to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans in order to trim federal deficits and tame the runaway national debt. The vast wealth inequality in our country, as well as the disparity between the taxes often paid by businesses and the wealthiest Americans compared to lower-income taxpayers, certainly helps justify the argument that a heavier tax burden should be borne by the most fortunate among us. At the time, though, I argued that before the government demands more from any of us, it owes it to all of us to be more responsible with our tax dollars. 

I remain consistent in my assessment of half a decade ago when it comes to the current proposed Republican tax plan. The truth is, most taxpayers would selfishly welcome paying less taxes. But what is the cost of these tax cuts for society as a whole? Just like I once questioned the wisdom of raising taxes in light of a fiscally irresponsible government running up the federal debt, I now question the call for cutting taxes while the government runs budget deficits on a yearly basis.

The main argument in favor of the Republican tax plan is that it will spur economic growth, thereby increasing government revenue. But that involves a very precarious presumption: that the economy will continue growing uninterrupted, even when the current streak is already one of the longest ever. Just like a responsible family accounts for unforeseen circumstances when crafting a budget, the government must consider what happens if the economy slows. And while a family with a robust emergency fund can better withstand a monetary hit, one with a mortgage, car payments, student loans, and several maxed-out credit cards would likely face financial ruin if a major crisis surfaces. With the federal debt currently at over $20 trillion and annual deficits of hundreds of billions of dollars, there's no disputing which family's budget situation most closely resembles our own government.

A balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution might be a solution to the government's out of control spending. Of course, such an amendment could bring about a whole new set of problems. Ultimately, just like a family facing the reality of a less-than-ideal financial situation, it would take courage, sacrifice, and innovation for our government to operate within its means. 

The bottom line is, even though the idea of tax cuts is always attractive to those who pay them, the government getting its fiscal house in order by controlling spending is a much more pressing priority. Almost five years ago, I called on the government to hold off on raising taxes until it cut wasteful spending. Today, we should call on the government to hold off on tax cuts for the very same reason.

Mayim Bialik Should Apologize for Apologizing

With the Harvey Weinstein scandal all over the news recently, many people have come out on social media to speak on sexual harassment and assault. Obviously, the vast majority of sane humans is against such atrocious behavior. But probably the most important outcome from all this is increased awareness of just how pervasive this behavior is throughout our society, particularly the workplace.

Adding her own two cents and sharing her experiences on this hot-button topic, actress Mayim Bialik penned an opinion piece published in The New York Times. In it, she describes how her "self-protecting and wise" choices and behavior have contributed, along with what she terms her "non-traditional" physical appearance, to her steering clear of the kinds of encounters suffered by women who may dress provocatively and "act flirtatiously."

Naturally, there was a backlash by victims of sexual harassment and assault and their advocates who make the most important point of all: sexual harassment and assault is always the perpetrator's fault and never the victim's fault. That is 100% true. Period. Full stop.

But while asserting that victims are always blameless is certainly a valid point, that doesn't mean that Ms. Bialik's point is not valid. In fact, in her essay, she points out how "women should be free to act however they want" in a "perfect" world. And that's true! In a perfect world, anyone and everyone should be free to act however they want: free to walk down a dark alley in a crime-ridden neighborhood in the middle of the night; free to wear blue in Bloods gang territory; free to pet a rattlesnake. Sure, in a "perfect" world, we should be free to do any of those things. But the fact is, our world is far from perfect, and while a woman does not deserve to be sexually harassed or assaulted no matter how provocatively she dresses or how flirtatiously she acts, engaging in certain behaviors can certainly be misinterpreted by men blinded by hormones, wealth, power, or a lethal combination of all three.

So, in essence, Mayim Bialik should apologize for apologizing. Or rather, she should not have apologized at all, because the points she made in her opinion piece are perfectly valid and appropriate. 

Gun Violence vs Gun Rights

In the wake of the horrific mass shooting in Las Vegas, we find ourselves, as a nation, once again grappling with the same questions that arise way too frequently: How do we stop the gun violence plaguing our country? How do we keep something like this from happening again? Naturally, these questions usually come up when the hurt is still fresh and the grieving is in full force, but also while the powerful gun lobby continues to look out for its own bottom line and decent law-abiding citizens seek to preserve their right to bear arms. All too often, these opposing forces create an environment where people are talking past each other rather than coming together to find common sense solutions. What typically ends up happening, as a result, is nothing much.

I don’t pretend to have all the answers. I’m just another concerned citizen who believes that our right to “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” is assaulted in a very real sense every time one of these brutal attacks occurs. But perhaps by sharing my interpretation of the Second Amendment, I can make at least a tiny positive contribution to the conversation about how best to solve an extremely serious problem.

The Second Amendment to the Constitution reads as follows:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The very first part of the amendment is where the greatest trouble lies. Based on the incredible amount of gun violence in our country, it is clear to any rational person, regardless of where they stand on gun laws, that the “well regulated” part of the Second Amendment is utterly failing. One of the NRA’s most famous slogans is: The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. Without getting into the merits or validity of the slogan itself, we can interpret it to mean that any regulation of guns should strive to keep guns out of the hands of the bad guys while not taking guns away from the good guys. The question then becomes, how do we determine who the good guys are and who the bad guys are? For our gun rights to be “well regulated,” the answer to that question becomes, very literally, a life and death matter.

The next word in the amendment, “Militia,” is also not without controversy. A militia is basically a civilian military force. Based on this definition, civilians may indeed possess military style weapons. However, the possession of these weapons by civilians must be “well regulated.” Therefore, ownership of these weapons should be severely restricted based on the qualifications of the civilian and the weapon’s degree of deadliness. In other words, the deadlier the weapon, the harder it should be to acquire. For civilians to possess military style weapons, they should have to exhaustively prove their physical and mental fitness, as well as receive the proper training on how to handle, use, and safely store such weapons.

The phrase “being necessary to the security of a free State” that follows in the amendment is important because it outlines the purpose of the militia. Broadly, we can interpret this to mean that armed civilians secure the “free State” by doing everything from fighting off an invading force (not very likely) to protecting their own homes and family from a burglar (much more likely).

Finally, the Second Amendment ends with “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This phrase enshrines in the Constitution our right to have guns, which brings us back to square one: How do we stop gun violence in the United States? Certainly, neither the spirit nor the original intent of the Second Amendment has anything to do with the devastating events unfolding across our nation on a seemingly regular basis. For that reason, we must demand that Congress respect the Constitution and ensure that our right to bear arms is “well regulated” by passing sensible laws that will safeguard our gun rights while helping to prevent these national tragedies.

ADDENDUM (10/05/2017):

I don't customarily make changes to my blog posts once they're published (with one notable exception), but I felt a certain uneasiness with this one almost as soon as I finished it. I realized that I spent a large part of the post addressing gun violence and gun rights through my interpretation of the Second Amendment, but I didn't address the social aspects of gun violence. I failed to bring up what are probably the most important questions of all: How can someone feel the need to commit such a horrible deed against other human beings? What would drive someone to act so violently?

Like I wrote before, I don't have all the answers. But taking a broad view of our social structure might offer some insight. While some may argue that we do not explicitly encourage such violence as a society, there can be little doubt that, at the very least, we pave the road by which these awful incidents travel, as we can see by taking a look at our nation's values.

The United States has the world's largest economy. We also spend more on the military than the next several nations combined. These two telling facts are a basic reflection of the values of our society. The most important things to us are wealth and power. We believe in accumulating untold riches. We also believe in strength, force, and domination. That's it! Long and healthy lives for our citizens? Forget it! We rank #42 in the world in life expectancy. A smart, well-educated populace? Please! The U.S. lags far behind many other countries in reading, math, and science while many of our teachers earn virtual poverty wages. Our values, once again, are money and might. Period.

So, how do we expect our mentally unstable citizens to react when they feel powerless? When there is such a stigma on mental illness? When we look down with disdain, starting with our own president, on those whom we perceive as "weak?" When our multi-billion dollar entertainment industry constantly bombards us with violent movies, TV shows, music, and video games, then uses their own people to hypocritically lament the acts of violence that happen in the real world? When it is so easy to get a deadly firearm with which to rain death upon fellow human beings? When the idea of strength is equal to wanton destruction in the eyes of certain twisted individuals?

We can't keep turning a blind eye to the effect that our own values play on our society. We can keep believing the people profiting from the violence, whether it's the entertainment industry telling us "it's just art" or the gun industry telling us "it's your Constitutional right." While we're at it, we might as well believe whatever the tobacco industry wants to tell us about cigarettes or whatever the fossil fuel industry wants to tell us about climate change!

Wealth and power. Those are our values. We either change our values, or we keep living (and dying) with the consequences.